Reliable terminal emulation in the modern age?

[Michael T. Halligan]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

After hearing everybody's glowing recommendations for the products I  
was failing to
use properly, I started from scratch.  I realized it was the latest  
version of BMC's
firmware which broke the terminal emulation. Terminal emulation is  
good, me
choosing a vendor who uses BMC's broken remote management firmware, less
than good!


On Nov 2, 2005, at 2:54 AM, Bill Ward wrote:

> On 11/1/05, Ulf Zimmermann <ulf at alameda.net> wrote:
>> I am very happy with SecureCRT, both for vt100 and xterm  
>> emulation. Also
>> like it for serial console. $99 initial purchase, I upgraded since  
>> then twice,
>> one of the best purchases I made in regards to software throughout  
>> the year.
>
> SecureCRT is quite good, and I too have a license for it.  Though
> these days when I need to ssh from a random Windoze box I typically
> use putty.
>
> --
> Help save the San Jose Earthquakes - http:// 
> www.soccersiliconvalley.com/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFDaQ6lwjCqooJyNAMRAqmvAJ94YNTPR03AeAyjHA5VrEgQDaJbvACfXR4F
AaH3DtwQrSILyZJ7EMd8vkQ=
=yJFi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----