[Baylisa] The Future of Systems Administrators

[Bruce Ferrell]

But did you have to use orca and virtual adrian to get it done right?

:)

On 01/20/2015 12:42 PM, Adrian Cockcroft wrote:
> I administrated a Raspberry Pi into submission a few weeks ago, spent an
> hour or so. It's going to copy the current weather from my weather station
> to weather underground until it gets a hardware failure and need to be
> replaced, hopefully it will last a few years. Is that what you meant?
>
> Adrian
>
> On Sunday, January 18, 2015, Rob Markovic <rob.markovic at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> With the coming wave of IoT, unfortunately, Sys Admin or not, we will all
>> become AoT, Adminitrators of Things.
>>
>> Some of us already are, with who knows how many different devices at home.
>>
>> Not going away until things administer themselves.
>>
>> -- Rob
>>
>> about.me/vRobM
>>   [image: Rob Marković on about.me]
>>     <http://about.me/vRobM>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jan 17, 2015 at 11:59 PM, Roy Rapoport <rsr at inorganic.org
>> <javascript:;>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 1/16/15 6:14 PM, Sean Hart wrote:
>>>
>>>> So, first off.  A lot of the low level sysadmins (kernel hackers,
>>>> rack-and-stackers, killer network folks, etc.) will go to huge
>>>> installations like Rackspace and Joyent and AWS.  They will do awesome
>>>> things there.
>>>>
>>> Putting aside the description of rack-and-stackers as doing "awesome
>>> things," I don't think it's actually accurate to say "a lot of the low
>>> level" folks will end up going to Joyent, Rackspace, etc, because with
>> the
>>> increasing concentration of physical hardware in the hands of relatively
>>> few players, the number of jobs dealing with hardware doesn't increase --
>>> it decreases for exactly the same sizing efficiencies that we as
>> customers
>>> then end up taking advantage of.
>>>
>>>  The Systems folks who do software installation and configuration/tuning
>>>> will pick up chef/puppet/ansible/$CONFIG_MGMT_OF_THE_WEEK, and
>>>> everything will be represented as code changes.
>>>>
>>> Some, certainly.  I brought Puppet into Netflix (and some other people
>>> later brought Chef in); but it still wasn't enough to save IT from being
>>> considered obsolete to production management, partially because we had so
>>> many IT people mired in an old and systems-specific way of thinking about
>>> what we built, and what the definition of "success" was.  And that old
>> way
>>> is basically bankrupt -- IT has traditionally done a terrible job serving
>>> its customers, I'd argue (though a fair case could be made that IT's
>>> typically put in an almost impossible position where it's very unlikely
>> to
>>> do anything but a terrible job -- one of the reasons I'd likely retire
>> from
>>> the workforce rather than ever go into IT again).
>>>
>>>  The all around, jack of all trades folks...  There's a lot here, but
>>>> will be mostly writing automation code of one form or another
>>>> (Provisioning, install, config, deployment, continuous
>>>> integration/deployment, etc.).  They will be working on the
>>>> Infrastructure as code movement and moving further and further up the
>>>> stack.
>>>>
>>> We've been hearing about "moving up the stack" in various contexts;
>>> remember when we heard about this in the context of the offshoring
>> movement
>>> and what we as engineers needed to do to stay relevant and employable? We
>>> were all going to become architects, and product managers, and ... a
>> whole
>>> bunch of other positions of which there weren't enough for everyone :)
>>>
>>>
>>> -roy
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Baylisa mailing list
>>> Baylisa at baylisa.org <javascript:;>
>>> http://www.baylisa.org/mailman/listinfo/baylisa
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Baylisa mailing list
>> Baylisa at baylisa.org <javascript:;>
>> http://www.baylisa.org/mailman/listinfo/baylisa
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Baylisa mailing list
> Baylisa at baylisa.org
> http://www.baylisa.org/mailman/listinfo/baylisa
>