Do you care about WHOIS contact information?

[Rick Moen]

Quoting David Wolfskill (david at catwhisker.org):

> Over the years, I've developed an approach for addressing (no pun
> intended) this situation, but before I explain that, I'd like to
> do a reality check and ask y'all what you (would) do about it.

Personally, I classify any scripted ssh login-attempt session using
"joe" username/password combos to be essentially doorknob-twisting
rather than an attack worthy of the name, and ignore it completely.
Going by shirtsleeve calculations, if one's system enforces good
password / keypairs, then the attempts you cite are astronomically 
unlikely to succeed within geologic time.  

The connecting system might have been a malware-compromised MS-Windows
box.  Or it might be a freshman misbehaving using his/her first shell
account.  And so on.  Sure, you're doing a socially beneficial thing
in attempting to clue people in that they might have compromised hosts
or rogue users.  One might respond similarly to incoming portscans.

I commend you for doing that.  I personally don't bother unless there's
some greater sign that a significant system (such as, say, a major
university ftp site or outgoing mail relay) has been root-compromised
and is being abused by criminals.  _Then_, I might send polite notes to
the WHOIS contact mailboxes, or even call the listed telephone numbers
(especially if the WHOIS e-mail mailboxes are in-band, and subject to 
possible interception by the bad guys).

-- 
Rick Moen         There was an old man             Said with a laugh, "I 
rick at linuxmafia   From Peru, whose lim'ricks all   Cut them in half, the pay is 
           .com   Looked like haiku.  He           Much better for two." 
                                                        --Emmet O'Brien