secure data erasing
Alvin Oga
alvin at Mail.Linux-Consulting.com
Wed Dec 7 18:35:58 PST 2005
hi ya payne
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005, Payne Freret wrote:
> Whatever is wrong with erasing tracking information, spare data blocks,
> and even the drive's second-stage firmaware if the alternative is to
> crush the drive with a big hammer?
if the plan is to destroy the disk/data ...
hammer is good if the hammer is used on the platters
since not everyone hits the body of the disk drives hard enough
to destroy the data on the platters
the itty-bitty section ofthe disk under the head at the time
of the hammer might get destroyed, but the rest of data on the
platter is still intact
the hammer approach has to hit the platters
if the plan is to recycle the disk for people to take home the
drives or giveawy to non-profits, than as was previously posted,
destroying some low level tracke ( servo ) info can be bad
thing .. but uv erasable eeprom "should be immune" to some magnetics
but if the beam is strong enough, who knows what north pole will
do under the extra strong magentic beams/pulses
c ya
alvin
More information about the Baylisa
mailing list