Annoying email dupes: analysis

[Mark C. Langston]

Checking the relevant Received: headers on our pet mail loop, we see:

Received: (from majordom at localhost)
        by www.baylisa.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5I0RUDu005915
        for baylisa-outgoing; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 17:27:30 -0700 (PDT)

Received: from mailgw2a.lmco.com (mailgw2a.lmco.com [192.91.147.7])
        by www.baylisa.org (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5I0PP8w005910
        for <baylisa at baylisa.org>; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 17:25:26 -0700 (PDT)

Received: from emss01g01.ems.lmco.com (relay1.ems.lmco.com [129.197.181.54])
        by mailgw2a.lmco.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i5HGdBcU028530;
        Thu, 17 Jun 2004 12:39:13 -0400 (EDT)

Received: from CONVERSION-DAEMON.lmco.com by lmco.com (PMDF V6.1-1X6 #30875) id +<0HZG00701OXBIR at lmco.com>; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:39:11 -0700 (PDT)

Received: from EMSS01I00.us.lmco.com ([129.197.181.70]) by lmco.com (PMDF +V6.1-1X6 #30875) with ESMTP id <0HZG005INOXA69 at lmco.com>; Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:39:10 -0700 (PDT)

Received: from EMSS01M12.us.lmco.com ([129.197.181.76]) by EMSS01I00.us.lmco.com +with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:39:11 -0700


It would appear the culprit is mailgw2a.lmco.com.  Could our friendly
neighborhood David temporarily reject mail from this MX unitl they can
get their act together?


-- 
Mark C. Langston                                    Sr. Unix SysAdmin
mark at bitshift.org                                       mark at seti.org
Systems & Network Admin                                SETI Institute
http://bitshift.org                               http://www.seti.org