CfV [Call for Volunteer(s)] -- internal BayLISA stuff
Alan DuBoff
aland at softorchestra.com
Fri Feb 20 21:02:32 PST 2004
David,
I can help you get it up and going. You say it has the gcc 2.95.2 compiler,
and presumably that's from the Companion CD, loaded in /opt/sfw.
I don't have a SPARC machine at home, but do have a Solaris x86 system
running Solaris 8 02/02 with the latest Companion CD on it.
Since I work at Sun I can get the Forte compiler also if that would be
needed, but the gcc compiler might be ok.
I don't use sendmail typically, and run exim, so I'll rely on your for that
piece of the puzzle, if you want/need my help.
ajd
On Friday 20 February 2004 12:27, David Wolfskill wrote:
> I've sent various versions of this out during the past week or so to
> more select groups; for those who have already seen it, I apologize.
>
> I'm asking for help getting some moderately-recent code compiled, up, &
> running on the BayLISA machine, which is a dual-CPU SPARCstation 10
> running Solaris 8.
>
> It has GCC 2.95.2 as the available C compiler.
>
> The software in question is some sendmail "milter"s (mail filters).
>
> There was a time when I was up for this sort of thing, but my Solaris
> box here at home has been exceedingly stable for a very long time --
> enough so all I've needed to do is replace the boot drive a couple of
> times in the last several years. (Well, I did swap the chassis out from
> underneath it, but that wasn't required.) Point is, I haven't
> needed to actually build any software with significant dependencies
> on a Solaris box for a long time: nearly all of the software-building
> I've been doing in the last few years has been in a FreeBSD
> environment, and my patience for dealing with manually chasing down
> dependencies has diminished more than I had realized.
>
> I'll avoid going into the gory details further on this list, but I will
> point out the reason for the request: I want to do a better job of
> blocking unwanted mail. In particular, I believe BayLISA would be
> well-served by implementing ClamAV (which I have implemented here at
> home) -- not to protect BayLISA members from the worms/viruses/...
> themselves, but to reduce the amount of worm/virus/...-spawned spam that
> the machine processes. And ClamAV has some dependencies on certain
> libraries.
>
> I also intend to implement a milter that will permit me to at least
> block receipt of mail that mentions Web sites that are known to be
> spamvertised, as well as using regexen to block other forms of unwanted
> mail. Given the capacity of the machine, I think that's a better fit
> than a full-blown spamassassin implementation.
>
> Please reply to me; I will work with the volunteer(s) to get this done.
>
> Thanks,
> david (current hat: postmaster at baylisa.org)
> --
> David H. Wolfskill david at catwhisker.org
> I do not "unsubscribe" from email "services" to which I have not explicitly
> subscribed. Rather, I block spammers' access to SMTP servers I control,
> and encourage others who are in a position to do so to do likewise.
>
>
--
Alan DuBoff
Software Orchestration, Inc.
GPG: 1024D/B7A9EBEE 5E00 57CD 5336 5E0B 288B 4126 0D49 0D99 B7A9 EBEE
More information about the Baylisa
mailing list