CfV [Call for Volunteer(s)] -- internal BayLISA stuff

Alan DuBoff aland at softorchestra.com
Fri Feb 20 21:02:32 PST 2004


David,

I can help you get it up and going. You say it has the gcc 2.95.2 compiler, 
and presumably that's from the Companion CD, loaded in /opt/sfw.

I don't have a SPARC machine at home, but do have a Solaris x86 system 
running Solaris 8 02/02 with the latest Companion CD on it.

Since I work at Sun I can get the Forte compiler also if that would be 
needed, but the gcc compiler might be ok.

I don't use sendmail typically, and run exim, so I'll rely on your for that 
piece of the puzzle, if you want/need my help.

ajd

On Friday 20 February 2004 12:27, David Wolfskill wrote:
> I've sent various versions of this out during the past week or so to
> more select groups; for those who have already seen it, I apologize.
> 
> I'm asking for help getting some moderately-recent code compiled, up, &
> running on the BayLISA machine, which is a dual-CPU SPARCstation 10
> running Solaris 8.
> 
> It has GCC 2.95.2 as the available C compiler.
> 
> The software in question is some sendmail "milter"s (mail filters).
> 
> There was a time when I was up for this sort of thing, but my Solaris
> box here at home has been exceedingly stable for a very long time --
> enough so all I've needed to do is replace the boot drive a couple of
> times in the last several years.  (Well, I did swap the chassis out from
> underneath it, but that wasn't required.)  Point is, I haven't
> needed to actually build any software with significant dependencies
> on a Solaris box for a long time:  nearly all of the software-building
> I've been doing in the last few years has been in a FreeBSD
> environment, and my patience for dealing with manually chasing down
> dependencies has diminished more than I had realized.
> 
> I'll avoid going into the gory details further on this list, but I will
> point out the reason for the request:  I want to do a better job of
> blocking unwanted mail.  In particular, I believe BayLISA would be
> well-served by implementing ClamAV (which I have implemented here at
> home) -- not to protect BayLISA members from the worms/viruses/...
> themselves, but to reduce the amount of worm/virus/...-spawned spam that
> the machine processes.  And ClamAV has some dependencies on certain
> libraries.
> 
> I also intend to implement a milter that will permit me to at least
> block receipt of mail that mentions Web sites that are known to be
> spamvertised, as well as using regexen to block other forms of unwanted
> mail.  Given the capacity of the machine, I think that's a better fit
> than a full-blown spamassassin implementation.
> 
> Please reply to me; I will work with the volunteer(s) to get this done.
> 
> Thanks,
> david           (current hat: postmaster at baylisa.org)
> -- 
> David H. Wolfskill				david at catwhisker.org
> I do not "unsubscribe" from email "services" to which I have not explicitly
> subscribed.  Rather, I block spammers' access to SMTP servers I control,
> and encourage others who are in a position to do so to do likewise.
> 
> 

-- 

Alan DuBoff
Software Orchestration, Inc.
GPG: 1024D/B7A9EBEE 5E00 57CD 5336 5E0B 288B 4126 0D49 0D99 B7A9 EBEE




More information about the Baylisa mailing list