Has anyone had a useful interaction with remove at dun.dnsrbl.com??!?

[David Wolfskill]

>Date: 13 Feb 2003 12:12:45 -0800
>From: wolfgang+gnus20030213T120724 at wsrcc.com (Wolfgang S. Rupprecht)

>I'm not a fan of the dialup lists either.

Thanks.  :-)

>Many of them have made noises at one time or other of listing all
>cable-modems and dsl's irregardless of them being static or dynamic
>addresses.

Which is their right, in some sense.  It does rather call into question
the wisdom of using their service(s), though.

>  63.193.123.122: IPv4 'adsl-63-193-123-122.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net'

>Since pacbell didn't give any meaningful names to the IP addresses

Umm... 'scuse me?  Please note:

g1-13(4.7-S)[1] host 63.193.123.122
122.123.193.63.IN-ADDR.ARPA domain name pointer adsl-63-193-123-122.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net
g1-13(4.7-S)[2] host adsl-63-193-123-122.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net
adsl-63-193-123-122.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net has address 63.193.123.122
g1-13(4.7-S)[3]

What more could a person ask for?  There's a PTR record for the IP
address, and the hostname from the PTR is resolvable to the same IP
address.  This is A Good Thing -- and far better than a lot of other
netblocks I've dealt with....  :-{

>several of the dialup list maintainers assumed that they were dynamic
>DSL.

Something about the word "assume" comes to mind at this point....  :-/

>I think most of them have since fixed their listings.  You can
>check most of the dnsbl's from this page:

>        http://www.moensted.dk/spam/

Ah; thanks.  Not as bad as it could be:

[<<|<] 63.193.123.122 [>|>>] was found in 8 lists (of 438 tested)

I guess I still need to help educate the folks who are using the
disservices in question....  :-(

>(NOTE: The email address above is valid.  Edit it at your own peril.)

I just elided it, figuring that since you responded to a post to the
baylisa list, you'd see the response posted to the same list.  :-}

Thanks,
david       (links to my resume at http://www.catwhisker.org/~david)
-- 
David H. Wolfskill				david at catwhisker.org
WARNING: Use of Microsoft products may be hazardous to your system's integrity.